-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
Apply file.copyright from early 2026 check #178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Apply file.copyright from early 2026 check #178
Conversation
|
@neatudarius is this ok to merge? |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 21914486666Details
💛 - Coveralls |
| // include/beman/optional/detail/stl_interfaces/iterator_interface.hpp -*-C++-*- | ||
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception | ||
|
|
||
| // Copyright (C) 2019 T. Zachary Laine |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for contribution Andrei! It seems we havr an unexpected case here, I didn't anticipate these files need to be updated.
We need to remove these lines to be Beman Standard compliant with include/. I'm not sure if we can legally do this with the this header which was copied from @tzlaine . @steve-downey ?
v1: directly remove the copyright line
v2: move stl interfaces into a special whitelisted directory (e.g., external/, deps/)
|
It's actually somewhat worse, it looks like the SPDX block at the top of the iterator headers is wrong. |
1 similar comment
|
It's actually somewhat worse, it looks like the SPDX block at the top of the iterator headers is wrong. |
Agree, we should remove SPDX lines from these 3 files. I propose the following approach:
=================================== I propose to do #2, e.g., @steve-downey @AndreiDurlea , what do you think? |
|
I think approach 2 sounds right, I'll get to implementing it if everyone's on board with the idea. |
@neatudarius to clarify, I'm removing SPDX but reverting the commit that removed the Copyright notice. Is that ok? |
This reverts commit 23800d9.
by removing the SPDX identifier instead
neatudarius
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM for spdx changes
The ignore list sounds good to me. |
#177